30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
United States of America

+1 (212) 408-5182
tmccormack@chadbourne.com

Download a V-Card

Thomas J. McCormack

Partner

Practice Description

Tom McCormack is a trial lawyer with over 25 years of experience handling complex commercial, securities and class action litigations.  During the course of his career, he has tried a wide range of cases, involving multi-billion dollar energy supply contracts, bank loans, joint venture agreements, corporate governance and securities claims, drug development projects and many others.

Representative Matters

  • In re Tribune Company, Mr. McCormack is representing the Creditors' Committee in pursuing certain claims arising out of the bankruptcy of Tribune Company, which filed a Chapter 11 case owing over $13 billion. 
  • In re Yukos Oil Company Ltd., Mr. McCormack was trial counsel to the receiver of Yukos Oil (appointed by the Russian Courts) in obtaining U.S. injunctive relief precluding Yukos’s management from selling a $1.6 billion Lithuanian oil refinery.
  • In Public Utilities Commission of California v. Sellers of Long Term Contracts, Mr. McCormack was trial counsel to Allegheny Energy in successfully defeating California’s highly publicized claims to abrogate over $12 billion of electricity supply contracts.
  • Mr. McCormack has represented numerous financial institutions, including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan Chase, in a variety of litigation matters involving, among other things, failed tender offers, syndication disputes, loan defaults and "lender liability” claims.
  • In Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson, Mr. McCormack was trial counsel to Purdue in pursuing claims against Johnson & Johnson arising out of its breaches of a joint drug development and marketing agreement. The case settled favorably mid trial.
  • Mr. McCormack has represented various officers and directors of publicly traded companies in class actions and derivative suits, defending allegations of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duties and related claims, in state and federal courts around the country.
  • In Zinc Corporation of America v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd., a case arising out of a joint venture for the manufacture of battery components, Mr. McCormack obtained a judgment, after 23 days of hearings, dismissing all of ZCA’s breach of fiduciary duty claims and awarding Mitsui sole ownership of the joint venture and $15 million on its counterclaims.
  • In re Bennett Funding Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Mr. McCormack defended a major insurance brokerage firm in a series of class action and securities fraud claims filed in the wake of the collapse of an equipment leasing company accused of selling nearly $1 billion of sham securities.
  • In Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc., Mr. McCormack was trial counsel to Moore in a Delaware federal court action seeking to compel Wallace to accept Moore’s $1.3 billion hostile tender offer. 
  • In American Steel Products Corp. v. The Penn Central Corp., Mr. McCormack was trial counsel to American Steel in successfully pursuing securities fraud claims against Penn Central in a case arising out of a failed leveraged buy-out for a steel mill.


Reported Decisions

Some of the significant reported decisions in cases in which Mr. McCormack has been involved in recent years include:

  • In re Isolagen Inc. Securities and Derivative Litigation, 279 Fed. Appx. 133 (3d Cir. 2008) (dismissing as premature plaintiff's appeal of the dismissal of a shareholder derivative suit where subsequent proceedings arising out of a related securities class action were contemplated).
  • T & E Pastorino Nursery v. Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., LLC, 123 Fed. Appx. 813 (9th Cir. 2005) (affirming the dismissal, on grounds of pre-emption and the filed rate doctrine, of several putative class action suits challenging the terms of numerous multi-billion dollar energy supply agreements). 
  • Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P. v. Gotham Partners, L.P., 286 F.3d 613 (2d Cir. 2002) (in a case of first impression, holding that Section 13(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 does not provide a money damages remedy to an issuer of securities). 
  • Orthocraft, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., 2002 WL 3160477 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 16, 2002) (denying motion to amend complaint seeking to differentiate a new class of cell phone service subscribers from a class previously denied certification). 
  • In re Estate of Hofmann, 287 A.D.2d 119, 733 N.Y.S.2d 168 (A.D. 1st Dep’t. 2001) (reversing lower court’s denial of a motion to dismiss and dismissing claims collaterally estopped by a prior litigation).
  • In re Tobacco/Governmental Health Care Costs Litigation, 83 F. Supp. 2d 125, (D.D.C. 1999), aff’d, 249 F.3d 1068 (D.C. Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 994 (2001) (dismissing claims made by the Republic of Guatemala for the recovery of health care costs purportedly incurred by its citizens). 

Honors

Mr. McCormack is recognized for commercial and securities litigation in Benchmark: Litigation (2010), for commercial litigation in Chambers USA – The World’s Leading Lawyers for Business (2007-2010), and for business and securities litigation in New York SuperLawyers (2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010) and New York Super Lawyers: Corporate Counsel Edition (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010).

Activities and Affiliations

  • Court-Appointed Mediator, Commercial Division, New York Supreme Court, New York County, 1997 to date
  • Member: American Bar Association; International Bar Association; Federal Bar Council

Publications


[ more publications ]

Speeches and Events

 

Practice Areas

Commercial Litigation

Banking and Financial Services Litigation

Litigation

Communications, Media and Technology

Bankruptcy and Financial Restructuring

Appellate

Adversarial

Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement

Regions

Asia

Japan

United States

North America

Education

  • Stanford University, B.A., 1978
  • Cornell Law School, J.D., 1982

Professional Background

  • Admitted to courts throughout the country for the purpose of litigating individual cases, including courts in California, Arizona, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Georgia, Mississippi, Florida, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland and the District of Columbia

Admissions

1983

New York

1984

U.S.D.C. - E.D.N.Y.

1999

U.S.D.C. - N.D.N.Y.

1984

U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y.

2010

U.S. Ct. App. - 1st Cir.

1992

U.S. Ct. App. - 2nd Cir.

2007

U.S. Ct. App. - 3rd Cir.

2003

U.S. Ct. App. - 9th Cir.

2000

U.S. Ct. App. - D.C. Cir.

Languages

English