30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
United States of America

+1 (212) 408-5433
dhopkins@chadbourne.com

Download a V-Card

Dennis C. Hopkins

Partner

Practice Description

Dennis Hopkins focuses his practice on all aspects of intellectual property, with an emphasis on patent, copyright and trade secret litigation. Mr. Hopkins has significant experience in all phases of IP litigation, including mediations, trials and appeals. In addition, Mr. Hopkins' practice includes counseling clients on issues relating to litigation strategies and intellectual property management. He is also experienced in all aspects of brand and domain name protection. His IP experience also includes drafting and negotiating agreements and licenses, preparing written opinions, and providing general IP counseling to clients, including counseling on patent, copyright, trade secret, brand management and other trademark matters.

Representative Matters

  • Represents a defendant in a multi-defendant patent litigation case in the Eastern District of Texas. The matter involves business method patents directed towards internet-based electronic commerce.
  • Represents a major financial institution in a multi-defendant patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas.
  • Technology Patents LLC v. Deutsche Telekom AG, et al. (D. Md.) Represented Avea İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş., a Turkish telecommunications company, as a defendant in a patent infringement action in the District of Maryland. Our client's involvement in the case was terminated upon the court granting our motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. 
  • PowerDsine, Inc. v. AMI Semiconductor, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.)  Represented plaintiff PowerDsine in an action filed against AMI Semiconductor in federal court for breach of a nondisclosure agreement covering semiconductor technology. Counterclaims filed against PowerDsine and its corporate parent, Microsemi, for breach of contract, business defamation and interference with prospective business relations were dismissed on Microsemi and PowerDsine's motion for summary judgment. The case was settled on terms favorable to PowerDsine and Microsemi. 
  • PowerDsine, Inc. v. Broadcom Corporation (E.D.N.Y.) Represented PowerDsine against two former employees for breach of confidentiality and non-competition agreements and against their new employer, Broadcom Corporation, for tortious interference with contractual relationships. 
  • PowerDsine, Ltd. v. Texas Instruments Incorporated (E.D.N.Y.) Represented PowerDsine in the enforcement of its copyright and trade secret rights regarding Power-over-Ethernet software protocols against Texas Instruments. 
  • Represented a major financial institution in a trade secret and copyright infringement action in the District of Delaware. The case was favorably settled. 
  • ISCO International v. Conductus, Inc. and Superconductor Technologies, Inc. (D. Del.) Served as trial counsel for defendant Conductus, Inc. in a patent infringement action involving receiver front ends for cellular base stations. The trial resulted in a successful jury verdict and a judgment finding the patent-in-suit invalid and unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. The case was affirmed on appeal. 
  • U.S. Philips Corp. v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. (S.D.N.Y.) Represented defendants Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Linear Technology Corporation in a patent infringement action brought by U.S. Philips involving a system for controlling communications between integrated circuits. The case was settled on favorable terms. 
  • Colorocs Information v. Xerox Corporation (S.D.N.Y.) Represented defendant Xerox in a patent infringement action involving multiple patents concerning plain paper color reproduction technology. The case was favorably settled. 
  • Aventis Cropscience, N.V. v. Pioneer Hi--Bred Int'l, Inc. (M.D.N.C.) Represented Aventis Cropscience in a patent infringement case involving methods for genetically engineering plant cells. 
  • Wilden Pump & Eng’g Co. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (C.D. Cal.) Represented defendant Ingersoll Rand in securing summary judgment of invalidity in a patent infringement case involving electronic pump controls.

Activities and Affiliations

Mr. Hopkins is a member of the American Bar Association (Section of Litigation, Intellectual Property Committee), Intellectual Property Owner's Association, Federal Bar Counsel, New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Association of the Bar of the City of New York (Former committee memberships: Patents Committee; Committee on Minorities in the Profession), Practicing Attorneys for Law Students (PALS) (Board of Directors). In addition, he is a member of Chadbourne’s Recruiting, Pro Bono and Professional Staff Committees.

Speeches and Events

 

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property

Litigation

Regions

North America

United States

Education

  • U.S. Military Academy at West Point, B.S., 1988
  • Rutgers University School of Law, J.D., 1998

Professional Background

  • Attack Helicopter Platoon Leader, U.S. Army, 1988-1991 
  • U.S. Army Reserves, 1991-2003

Admissions

1998

New Jersey

1999

New York

1998

U.S.D.C. - D.N.J.

1999

U.S.D.C. - E.D.N.Y.

1999

U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y.

2000

U.S. Ct. App. - Fed. Cir.

Languages

English